Blog

Talking residents, not just residence at Saxton

June 8th, 2010 [ No comments ] [ Add comment ]
by Simon Gawthorpe

080610_1

It’s a lovely Friday and the sun is shining on Saxton, Leeds. I’m on my way to a meeting in the city centre and I walk past a group of the existing tenants from Saxton Gardens making use of the seating area on The Avenue we have recently given a make over. While out enjoying a cup of tea and some neighbourly banter I discovered that I share my birthday with the chair of the Saxton Gardens TARA, John Boyd (I did of course on finding out offer up some of my birthday cake which seemed to go down particularly well with the tea!).

We are lucky enough to have a great relationship with the residents on the existing estate, we see them regularly when they pop in to the office to share some news or get an update, we socialise with them at a variety of different events we have held at Saxton or round at the club hosted by them, which are usually over a game of bingo, and not usually won by us!

On a more formal basis we have been attending their AGM for the past six years, the most recent of which was earlier this month. I always come away with a sense of pride in what are trying to do at Saxton and how we have worked and continue to work with John and his committee. The format this year was the same as every other and as always the existing committee were re-elected, and it’s no wonder when you see what a great job they do. Saxton Gardens is a real community, all the people know each other by name (and more than often than not by business too), they all look out for each other and pull together in times of need. The big snow this winter was an outstanding example of this. When a number of the elderly residents felt they were unable to leave their flats because of the icy conditions on the streets, the community rallied round and made sure that all of these people were checked in on daily, and regular group runs to the shops made sure no one went without the essentials.

Urban Splash have been very lucky to be welcomed into this community and even though we haven’t always been the best neighbours, after all we are a building site both noisy and dirty by nature, we still get on well. We haven’t spent our time here without the odd complaint or two, however working alongside John and his committee there hasn’t been a single issue over the years we haven’t been able to resolve amicably. That’s because we know and respect that the people who live here really care about the area and enjoy living here. The Boyd family alone have had at one point 20 members from 5 generations living throughout the estate. Perhaps that’s why it feels like a family, fully fitted with parent like figures making sure people keep the place tidy and pick up their litter after themselves. There is no real secret it’s just about being normal and respectful.

080610_2

As we near the completion of the first building at Saxton, the number of new residents is growing daily and our first HomeBuy Direct* residents are due to move in within the month. The next challenge for us is to make sure our new residents become part of this community and share the same sense of pride and belonging in the place they live. I hope this relationship will grow, helped by a number of community events. When the allotments are ready for planting, they will also be available for both new and existing residents… we have a number of both on the waiting list already!

I think that Saxton is going to be a great place to live and one of the best in the city centre, we know the communal gardens are pretty unique within Leeds and will be a great asset for the residents and added to this our purchasers will be moving in to a ready made community. As one of the residents said to me a while ago, ‘We love this place, the majority of us have lived here for nearly 50 years and we take great pride in it and we certainly hope that the new residents will do the same, and they are more than welcome to come and have a game of snooker or bingo and a drink with us in the club’. Certainly not an offer I’m refusing!

Filed under: Affordable homes, Leeds, Saxton, Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

Wining and dining at Royal William Yard

June 3rd, 2010 [ No comments ] [ Add comment ]
by Paul Clifton

030610_1

The other night I attended the inaugural Plymouth Wine Tasting event at Royal William Yard. More than 300 business people, residents and visitors came down for the occasion so the Yard was absolutely bustling, more than usual!

We really were spoilt, treated not only to 70 types of wine but fresh oysters from the River Yealm, pates and cheeses. The event was attended by people from all over Plymouth and Devon and it was great to hear from people who were on their first visit to the redeveloped Yard. The atmosphere was great and generous attendees even raised a few hundred pounds for local charity.

The organisers were so impressed that they’re talking about a repeat performance in the autumn, I really hope they do because it was a fantastic evening.

Filed under: Plymouth, Royal William Yard, Urban Splash - tags:

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

010610_1

I saw a great new Picasso show at the Tate Liverpool last week (even if I am a bit biased being a Trustee!). At the lenders dinner, which launched the show, there were the three directors of the three Picasso museums in Spain and France, Picasso’s granddaughter and one of his muses who features in this show. They all know a lot more about Picasso than me!

The show was interesting, not just because these are great works of art but because there’s a narrative. For Picasso painting was a weapon. He fought the Nazis with his paintbrush, refused their bribes of coal and food in occupied Paris, apparently saying ‘Spaniards don’t get cold’. He then went on to draw the ‘Dove of Peace’ which became the symbol for the peace movement.

010610_2
Tom Bloxham MBE joins Alexei Sayle at the exhibition launch - Copyright John Charlton Photography 2010

The exhibition starts with a chronology of events from World War 2, the Cuban Missile Crisis and some great clips of Picasso attending the World Peace Conference in Sheffield – something that shows a great artist trying to change the world.

It’s a world class show and it’s great that it’s in Liverpool; it’s a real symbol of the City’s success in turning itself around in the last few years.

The exhibition will run until 30th August, in the meantime to read more about the show:

Visit The Guardian

Visit The Times

Visit The Independent

Visit The Liverpool Echo

Filed under: Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash - tags: ,

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

An awarding week! by Tom Bloxham MBE

May 27th, 2010 [ No comments ] [ Add comment ]
by Tom Bloxham MBE

270510_1

I was really pleased to learn we had won another two RIBA Awards for Architecture this week for Chips in Manchester and Mills Bakery in Plymouth.

We’ve now received 22 RIBA awards for architecture. As satisfying as this it’s also a burden to ensure we keep striving to be innovative and build real quality schemes that will continue to win awards.

As I tell every member of staff who joins Urban Splash, we’re only as good as our last (or should that be next!?) scheme, so we must keep striving towards the next project, and hopefully the next award! If you go into a restaurant and have nine good meals and one bad one, it’s the bad one that gets talked about; we’ll just keep trying to avoid the cock-up!

270510_2

Here’s a full list of the Awards for Architecture that we’ve received over the years:

RIBA Award for Architecture 1996 - Concert Square Buildings
RIBA Award for Architecture 1996 - Schoolhouse
RIBA Award for Architecture 1997 - Modo
RIBA Award for Architecture 1998 - Smithfield Buildings
RIBA Award for Architecture 2001 - Britannia Mills
RIBA Award for Architecture 2001 - Old Haymarket
RIBA Award for Architecture 2002 - Matchworks
RIBA Award for Architecture 2002 - Collegiate
RIBA Award for Architecture 2003 - Chorlton Park
RIBA Award for Architecture 2003 - Timber Wharf
RIBA Award for Architecture 2003 - Box Works
RIBA Award for Architecture 2003 - Waulk Mill
RIBA Award for Architecture 2006 – Clarence and Brewhouse Buildings
RIBA Award for Architecture 2006 – Moho
RIBA Award for Architecture 2007 – Budenberg HAUS Projekte
RIBA Award for Architecture 2008 – Chimney Pot Park
RIBA Award for Architecture 2008 - Guest Street, New Islington
RIBA Award for Architecture 2008 - Fort Dunlop
RIBA Award for Architecture 2009 - 3 Towers
RIBA Award for Architecture 2009 - Midland Hotel
RIBA Award for Architecture 2010 - Chips
RIBA Award for Architecture 2010 - Mills Bakery

We also won the RIBA Client of the Year award in 2002 (you can only win it once!), here’s all the other RIBA awards we’ve won too…

Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 1997 - Smithfield Buildings
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 1998 - Smithfield Buildings
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 1999 - Collegiate
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2000 - Chorlton Park
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2000 - Timber Wharf
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2001 - Tea Factory
Shortlisted for Best Commissioner Award 2001
RIBA Client of the Year 2002
Housing Corporation Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2003 - Chorlton Park
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2003, Highly Commended - Box Works
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2003, Highly Commended - Old Haymarket
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2003 - Burton Place
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2003 - Timber Wharf
Housing Design Award (ODPM, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2005 - Clarence & Brewhouse Buildings
Housing Design Award (ODPM, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2005 - Langworthy
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2006 – Burton Place
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2006 – Piercy Street
Housing Design Award (NHBC, DETR, RTPI, RIBA) 2007 - Lake Shore
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2008 - Overall completed Chimney Pot Park
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2008 - Historic Award Smithfield Building
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2008 - Project Award, Tribeca Housing
Housing Design Award (DCLG, NHBC, RTPI, RIBA) 2008 - Project Award, Tribeca Phase 1
RIBA Crown Estate Conservation Award 2009 - Midland Hotel

Filed under: Chips, Manchester, Mills Bakery, New Islington, Plymouth, Royal William Yard, Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

A bird’s eye view of Royal William Yard

May 13th, 2010 [ No comments ] [ Add comment ]
by Paul Clifton

130510_1

You’ve probably read a lot about Royal William Yard recently. We’ve certainly had a busy month; the new moorings, the waterbus and the Seco Lounge restaurant, but one thing you’ve probably not yet read about is the newest, winged member of our team!

This month, a hawk joined us at the Yard with a view to assisting the seagull control scheme existing around Plymouth waterfront. The hawk’s first flight was last week, and his trainer guided his flight over the scheme in order that he could get used to the buildings. The hawk returned a few days later to fly around the scheme once more, avoiding Melville and Cooperage whilst issues with their roofs were resolved.

He’ll be back again in a few days time and will be a regular feature at the scheme moving forward.

Filed under: Plymouth, Royal William Yard, Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

I have never been to Oz, so was excited when I was asked to give a keynote presentation to 1000 delegates in Sydney for the Australian Institute of Architects annual conference. Everyone said I was crazy going all that way for a weekend and I wanted to go for longer but pressures of work meant I could only spare five days with 24hrs travelling each way including a day on route in Abu Dhabi to look at some new buildings and two days in Sydney. I was looking forward to an exiting paid for trip, seeing a new bit of the world.

Alas the Icelandic Ash cloud put a stop to my well laid out plans (was it the Icelandic Bankers getting there own back on us for suing them?), my flights were cancelled, a contingency plan was needed. So, I was left at 6.30am on a wet Friday morning in a small room in Manchester talking into a big TV screen, not seeing or hearing the thousand or so people on the other side of the world hanging on to my every word. Or not, perhaps… I had no way of knowing. It was most bizarre.

The worst part was the end, when the camera turned and I could finally see my audience (not all of whom had fallen asleep) and answer some questions (but no difficult ones I told them). At last my virtual trans continental ordeal was over and I was relieved until I heard they were all going for Friday evening drinks in the sun on Sydney harbour side, while I had to walk through the rain to start the days work at 8am in Manchester. The Icelanders had got there revenge!

Below is the full report from the talk:

Tom Bloxham’s keynote presentation at the Australian Institute of Architects National Conference 2010 at Darling Harbour in Sydney last week was in keeping with his reputation for overcoming the odds. The eruption of Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokull volcano may have thwarted his plans for a first-time visit to Australia, but there he was on the big screen talking to a packed-out session, coolly moving through his impressive audiovisuals with a flick of his hand – microwave link apparently… whatever that is.

He’s a man accustomed to doing things differently. As founder and chief executive officer of property development company Urban Splash, Bloxham is something of an urban regeneration pioneer. Since its beginnings in 1993 Urban Splash has won almost 300 awards for design, architecture and urban renewal and in 1999 Bloxham was awarded an MBE. He is also an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Institute of British Architects.

It was his entrepreneurial spirit that got Bloxham into property development. When he moved to Manchester at 19 to study politics and modern history he began printing and selling posters to students. But when he began subletting portions of his first retail space at Afflecks Palace, and discovered this was much more lucrative than selling posters, his career in property began.

Bloxham sees himself as more of a regenerator than a developer, taking old, unused buildings and industrial sites and creating vibrant mix-used spaces, to revitalise both them and the communities where they are located.

‘We buy these buildings that the property industry says are useless and turn ordinary places into extraordinary ones,’ says Bloxham.

Not only is it more environmentally sustainable to use structures that are already there but it is socially responsible to bring life back into urban areas that have fallen by the wayside, says Bloxham.

The company aims to use less energy by regenerating rather than demolishing and to use sustainable features such as green roofs, open spaces, locally generated power, on-site bore water and the creation of local employment.

In a recent essay published by The Smith Institute Bloxham describes his philosophy to regeneration:

‘I started in the property industry – not even knowing what a covenant was – by leasing or buying those old, unloved buildings and exposing the great Victorian features that lay hidden inside them.

‘We leased them to young, entrepreneurial, creative companies; first as retail space at Afflecks Palace in Manchester and The Palace on Slater Street in Liverpool, later as workspace in buildings such as Ducie House in Manchester and finally as residential loft apartments, such as Concert Square in Liverpool and Smithfield Building and Sally’s Yard in Manchester. This brought in a new generation of people, who wanted to live, work, eat, drink and have fun in city centres that had, until then, been empty beyond 6 pm.’

060510_1
Concert Square, Liverpool

At Concert Square in Liverpool an old derelict tea factory was converted into a mixed use development with public squares, residential in the upper floors, offices in the middle and retail on the lower level.

In the old match factory in Liverpool, the last in the UK, Urban Splash kept the concrete columns that were used throughout the building and constructed pods and kitchens at the back of the building to create a large commercial space.

In Bradford, which was once the centre of UK’s textile trade, the old mill buildings created by English investor and industrialist, Samuel Lister in the 1800s,as part of his huge empire had been left to rot. Following the decline of the industry unemployment escalated and riots became common. Urban Splash brought the Victorian mills back to life and, says Bloxham, helped ‘the community to be proud of itself.’

‘A mass of developers entered the race to refurbish every underused building and construct exciting new mixed-use developments on the former bomb-site car parks. The new residents who inhabited them brought great spending power into city centres. They paid council tax, and were often educated, articulate, active citizens. This encouraged councils to improve city-centre services and retailers to take advantage of a new breed of customer, who wanted all that the cities had to offer,’ says Bloxham.

060510_2
Silk Warehouse Bradford

One project, New Islington in Manchester, involved partnerships between government, community organisations and private developers. These included Urban Splash, regeneration agencies English Partnerships and New East Manchester together with Manchester Methodist Housing Association.

The result was the conversion of an old low density council housing estate where people were unemployed and disenfranchised into a mixed use higher density development. It now houses people from varying socio economic backgrounds in 1400 rather than the previous 100 homes and contains large areas of public space, including canals and wetlands.

‘We asked ourselves how do we turn the worst estate in Manchester into one of the best?’ says Bloxham.

‘We created an interesting streetscape and there was also a big emphasis on sustainability in this project. We’ve retained materials wherever we can, used features such as green roofs and created a massive area of wetlands.’

Nest boxes in the wetlands are designed to attract a range of birds including kingfishers, and low-level lighting minimises the impact on the wildlife. The project was shortlisted in the Sustainable Housing Awards, organised by Inside Housing magazine – the first to focus on the best green social housing projects in the UK.

060510_3
Matchworks Liverpool

Regeneration after the GFC
With the arrival of the global financial crisis, development in the UK, like everywhere else around the globe, ground to a halt. Bloxham says regeneration is at a crossroads.

‘If we are not careful, our towns and cities will be allowed to go into decline. We will lose the momentum gained over the past 20 years. Skilled practitioners will lose their jobs and regeneration will be left only to the private sector – but the private sector will not have access to the finance or debt to develop, at least not in the locations where the renaissance is most needed.’

The effective use of public-private partnerships has never been more necessary, says Bloxham, and the demand for quality housing is as great as it has ever been. But if regeneration is not to slide backwards, the public sector must take the lead and forge stronger partnerships with the private sector.

This would allow the regeneration sector to ‘take the benefit of low land values and of spare capacity in the regeneration, development and construction industries in order to work now in true partnership to continue the urban renaissance and create wonderful new places in our towns and cities.’

lblundell@thefifthestate.com.au
The Fifth Estate – sustainable property news and forum

Filed under: Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash - tags: ,

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

Park Hill and Marmite by Tom Bloxham MBE

April 21st, 2010 [ 1 comment ] [ Add comment ]
by Tom Bloxham MBE

210410_1

Park Hill has always been one of the most contentious Urban Splash schemes. A bit like Marmite; people either love it or hate it!

There are certainly many knockers who believe that Park Hill should be demolished rather than refurbished; apart from the fact that it’s illegal to pull down a listed building, its also unsustainable to demolish a building that could be saved!

It’s interesting looking at the blogs about Park Hill and seeing so many differing opinions on the scheme. I believe that the tide is beginning to turn and as we reveal new additions to the building I firmly believe not only are we restoring Park Hill but actually improving it. Every time I visit the place its great to see the how much it’s taking shape with big changes constantly being made, including the colourful facade.

To read more about Park Hill visit our blog or the BBC website’s updates on the scheme then let us know what your thoughts are below!

210410_2

Filed under: Park Hill, Sheffield, Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

1 comments to Park Hill and Marmite by Tom Bloxham MBE

  1. Kevan Doyle says:

    I grew up in a village in the Derbyshire dales and Sheffield was always our closest major city. The place you went to but records, to go to concerts and to begin to grow up into. I was always brought up to look down my nose at Park Hill. A place for those who lived on benefits, didn’t contribute anything and spent their lives indulging in anti-social behaviour.

    As I grew up, I got to know a number of people who lived at Park Hill and learned that its inhabitants were just like everyone else - stuggling through life and making the same mistakes as everyone else. I now visit family in derbyshire regularly and this entails a trip through the centre of sheffield. Each time my eyes drift towards the Park Hill skyline and I am thrilled to see how its changed on each consecutive visit. I happen to think that English Heritage are almost a liability under Simon Thurleys leadership, but on this decision they were not wrong.

    I am delighted that this important element of Shgeffield’s social history is being brought back to life and with any luck I will be first in line to buy one when they become available.

Regeneration: then and now by Tom Bloxham MBE

April 14th, 2010 [ No comments ] [ Add comment ]
by Tom Bloxham MBE

The following is taken from an interview between Tom Bloxham MBE and Regeneration and Renewal magazine.

From selling posters to property development, Urban Splash’s founder says that his work has always been about adding value. But the recession has brought new challenges, reports Adam Branson.

‘It’s like when I had my poster company. You have a piece of paper that cost 15 pence, you put some ink on it that costs you 30 pence and you sell the poster for £3,’ says Tom Bloxham, the ubiquitous chairman and co-founder of developer Urban Splash. ‘Likewise, what we’re trying to do in property is to take some land that’s not perceived to be particularly valuable, add great architecture and make it more valuable. Whereas property development is about fulfilling demand, regeneration is about creating it. It’s much more fulfilling to take a really crappy place and turn it into something beautiful.’ That pretty much sums up Bloxham’s attitude towards regeneration.

Founded by Bloxham in 1993, Urban Splash grew quickly, specialising in spotting opportunities offered by dilapidated buildings and in run-down areas that others had missed. With his love of quirky design and talent for publicity, Bloxham and Urban Splash were soon poster boys for noughties regeneration. In 2008, Bloxham was elected chancellor of the University of Manchester and last year he was appointed as a trustee of the Tate art galleries by the Prime Minister. For the past five years, he has been chair of think-tank the Centre for Cities, although he recently pledged to step down once a replacement is found. ‘The value of the centre is that it’s not just theory from boffins; its research is based on empirical evidence from doing a lot of work inside cities,’ says Bloxham, adding that he believes the think-tank has been hugely influential in the development of city-regional policy in England.

However, no matter how successful the last two decades have been for Bloxham, nobody operates independently from the wider economy. The last two years have hit Urban Splash hard.

Bloxham is clear about the reason for the firm’s struggles. ‘This crisis was caused by the banking industry and it hit housebuilders particularly hard because our buyers couldn’t get the mortgages that they’d agreed (because the lending criteria had changed by the time the homes were finished),’ he says. That meant that, on the multiple schemes on which Urban Splash was working when the crisis hit, the company went from thinking that it had sold most units to being able to complete sales on just a few. ‘On different schemes, between 30 and 70 per cent of sales weren’t able to be completed,’ says Bloxham. ‘But I firmly believe that we’re a better company for what we’ve been through. It’s taught us a lot of lessons.’

Now that some of the dust has settled, what lessons has Bloxham learned? ‘Lessons about managing change, about changing a business plan very quickly,’ he replies. ‘With the benefit of hindsight, the only mistake we made was that we should have phased some of the projects rather than trying to do them all at once. But, at the time, everybody was keen to get them done and the homes were mostly all sold, so we did them in one lot. And I guess that the other thing we’ve learned is that things can go down as well as up and you have to prepare for that.’

However, it is also clear that Bloxham believes that the regeneration sector has fundamentally changed since the crisis hit. ‘Housing-led regeneration, led by pre-sales, is finished for a number of years,’ he says. If that’s the case, how has the developer’s business model changed to reflect the new economic reality? ‘The demand for Urban Splash housing is as strong as it’s ever been. The problem is that people can’t get mortgages, so they want to rent it not buy it. What we’ve done historically is sell off the housing and kept the commercial parts of schemes. Increasingly now, we’re keeping both the commercial and residential parts,’ says Bloxham. ‘What we’re trying to do is to set up an Urban Splash lettings business. We want to maintain and manage the properties ourselves.’

More crucially, Bloxham believes that the economic situation demands that the public and private sectors find ways to ‘work more closely together’. Historically, when developers have said that they want to work more closely with the public sector, they have meant that they want the public sector to cough up more money. Bloxham, however, insists that he’s talking about finding more efficient ways to get the job done. ‘There are still billions and billions of pounds of public money being spent and I believe that there are more efficient ways of working and making it go further,’ he says. A typical example, he says, is education. ‘The greatest single driver of housing choice is where the good schools are,’ Bloxham says. ‘Yet in regeneration, there’s very little joined-up thinking between the provision of new housing and the provision of primary schools in particular. People often move into Manchester as single people and then move out to places like Stockport or Trafford when they have children because the schools are either better or perceived to be better. Getting some great primary schools in the city centre is one way of reversing that.’

Ultimately, however, Bloxham is urging public bodies to be upfront about what they want to get out of regeneration sites. ‘What happens typically is that when the public sector is disposing of some land they say: ‘Give me the highest value for it’. A better way of doing it would be on a more qualitative basis,’ he says. Under the system that Bloxham proposes, the price of the land would be fixed at the point that a council goes out to tender and developers would then bid against each other according to other criteria. ‘So then (the public body) says: ‘We’ll give it to the people who’ll give us the most affordable housing, the best new school, the most mixed community’.’ Choosing a developer based on the price offered for a site may be easier, he says, but it doesn’t necessarily make for better places. ‘What I’ve got a problem with is that everyone in the public sector gives lip service to good design and mixed-use, but then they go with the people who give the most money, because they can judge that absolutely,” says Bloxham. ‘I’m asking for some bravery and decision-making from the public sector: picking developers because they believe in what they can achieve.’

See more images of the Urban Splash portfolio here.

Filed under: Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

The listening developer by Nick Johnson

March 29th, 2010 [ 1 comment ] [ Add comment ]
by Nick Johnson

290310_1

The following blog is taken from this month’s Conservation Bulletin.

You know, there’s an awful lot of rubbish talked about working with communities. Since we became so politically correct about working in the built environment we are now seemingly required to involve or engage just about anybody who might have an opinion, no matter how ill informed or how remote or how totally inexperienced they may be, in what actually might be happening to the buildings and places that shape their locale. We’ve got to the stage now where the football equivalent would be obliging Sir Alex Fergusson to consult with the Old Trafford faithful about team selection before fielding the Reds on a Saturday afternoon. I blame the telly: this notion of public engagement, this right to be involved, stretches back to the early days of reality TV and beyond. It has its contemporary genesis in that Big Daddy of reality, Big Brother, but its beginnings are in the origins of TV – in Hughie Green and Opportunity Knocks’ frenzied clap-o-meter that dictated whether the participants stayed, or went. We’re obsessed with audience participation – especially in this age of technology – when we express our opinions in public so quickly, so easily and seemingly to so little effect.

Now you may think from this that I’m anti getting people involved. Actually that’s far from the truth but I think that we should involve people in a proper way, in a human way, and dispense with the thin veneer of professionalism and respectability in which we cloak our daily workings.

My first experience of community consultation, which was by no means the worst – probably middle ranking in the spectrum of good practice, if there is such a thing – was in Liverpool and was dubbed a ‘community planning weekend’. It captured the zeitgeist of the moment: Prince Charles was on the scene making waves in the world of carbuncle extensions and was cosying up to the then RIBA president, one Rod Hackney, Macclesfield’s fleetingly famous architectural son, self-proclaimed leader of the community architecture movement – this was, after all, the doldrums of the early 1990s’ post-crash property economy and
the community was the ‘last man’ standing. The weekend brought in the hordes to workshop, think and draw their way out of deprivation. Now, worthy and feel-good though this was it didn’t have any parameters, so when Barbara from Bootle wanted the Eiffel Tower in central Liverpool it was duly drawn, and now Barbara thinks that nobody listened to her because it’s not been built and she wouldn’t trust a property professional as far as she could throw them because they’re a ‘flipping [she didn’t use that word] waste of time’. I have some sympathy with her.

Contrast this, which now seems profound and resonant, with the completely vacuous and inconsequentialmethod of contemporary consultation designed to fit the newfound PFI model of procurement of regeneration projects. Public consultation now consists of the public being invited in to vote (yes it’s back to reality TV again) on which of the four competing shortlisted schemes (worked on in the vacuum of competition over the preceding six weeks to tight deadlines answering an unimaginable series of unanswerable questions) they prefer. The outcome doesn’t really matter provided the procedure-compliance gurus can tick the box that says the community were consulted and Europe can rest easy that here in England it’s a job well done.

Usually the public prefer the nice man with the pink shirt who said flattering things about their shoes and promised them a 92-inch plasma screen. If they’re anything like my mum, or even my partner, the public are not actually very good at reading plans or interpreting CGIs no matter how flash they are, and there’s certainly no way that 20 minutes and a cup of tea in a community centre with men in pink shirts will perform a miracle of understanding. No, because a community have to be actively engaged and involved from the word go,we need to see working with the community as an opportunity, not an impediment – we need to get to know them, enjoy their company, laugh a lot, cry a little and listen to what they’ve got to say in a way that makes them feel comfortable and able to make themselves heard. We need to stop being professional and remember that working in the building environment is one of the most human, most responsible and potentially most rewarding of endeavours – it’s not just a numbers game.

There is a way, I think, that we can work properly with communities and it takes the form of an anecdote from our work in New Islington. I used this anecdote in a PFI bid as our strategy for community consultation. It was rejected because it was impossible to score against the evaluation matrix.

Marjory was one of the local residents who were to be re-housed and whose community would change forever when our work was done. In the early days we were naïve and believed that everyone would be delighted to swap their neglected though generous council house for a more modest Urban Splash flat. Wrong, naïve, insulting and dangerous: we learnt on the job and we learnt quickly – listen don’t assume. Kevin, her son,was in the room looking threatening and with a pacey Mancunian invective on what he thought we were going to do to this area in the name of personal reward. So I asked Kevin what he wanted. He said he wanted to ‘make Ancoats cider’ so I said ‘okay we’ll build you an orchard … but you’ve got to look after it’, and so it was that the orchard became part of the inspiration for the Alsop/Grant plans for the park in New Islington.We built it with English Partnership’s money and had the first taste of Ancoats cider in 2008, a seemingly vintage year for our apple variety.

Now this is one tiny example of the way we went about working with, listening to and acting upon the views of the local community. At each point they had a meaningful input into what was to happen in the area, from the selection of the architect for their ‘’ouse’ to the name for the area. We helped translate processes in which we were bound into an unbidden set of options framed by real-world budgetary parameters that they had influence over and knowledge about.

We tried to give them six options for very decision, and every time,without fail, they came to the conclusion that we would have wanted them to, which has meant that we’ve not had to compromise and the result is a lot stronger, more meaningful and resilient than if we’d imposed our own distorted vision of what we wanted to see the area become.

That six months of meetings, discussion, dialogue and argument laid the framework for a strategy rather than the implied prescription of a masterplan. I have no time for masterplans. I have no time for PFI. I probably shouldn’t worry because I think they may both be about to disappear. What this disappearance will allow, I hope, is for proper time to be taken once again to get decisions right and for people to properly inform those decisions.

People working with the historic environment understand that decisions taken in a six-week period can last longer than a lifetime. For the sake of future generations that will marvel and delight in the built environment,we have to make sure that the processes we surround ourselves will permit this generation to come up with the places and spaces that will take a worthy place in the next.

Filed under: Urban Splash

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

1 comments to The listening developer by Nick Johnson

  1. inchristian louboutin says:

    We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

My MIPIM by Tom Bloxham MBE

March 23rd, 2010 [ 1 comment ] [ Add comment ]
by Tom Bloxham MBE

Fortunately (or maybe unfortunately!) this year the M-I-P-I-M in MIPIM did not stand for ‘Massive-International -Piss-up -In -March’! Instead it was a rather sober affair.

No longer like a student Freshers Week for surveyors, whom in past years I’ve watched late at night eyeing up and chatting up the six foot tall blondes working the Croisette, wanting to warn that if they took them home, they might be in for a surprise and the beautiful Francoise they were talking to (with a rather large Adam’s apple) looked to me more like a ‘Frank’! But on reflection leaving them to it with the thought they will probably both get what they deserve (and might even enjoy it!)

This year was quieter than ever, not only on the Croisette but large areas of the bunker were unsold. The mood was sober, the market is much more stable than last year and there is more good news out there than bad including many London stories of values back near the peak, driven up by overseas buyers. However any good news was drowned out by everyone talking about a possible double dip and the effects of post election public sector cuts.

Some people love it and some people hate it but I have always found MIPIM very useful. Over the few days I’ve had 27 meetings, three lunches and four dinners. I’ve hosted two parties and played a DJ set! I have met with Chief Executives, leaders of councils, heads of funders and joint venture partners and compared war wounds with other developers! I’ve cemented some existing relationships, done a couple of deals (I hope!) and got a few good new ideas.

However sober is not always good. The MIPIM drinking did always solve one problem for me; I am really, really bad at remembering names and faces. One way to sort this a friend explained, was if ever you meet someone from the property industry who seems vaguely familiar but you cant place them you can always try the favoured “Oh we met in MIPIM” line and chances are they’d either a) have met you in MIPIM b) think they might have met you but can’t remember because they’d had a drink or three or c) they’ve never been to MIPIM but didn’t want to say so!

But I must admit after a hard schedule the drink was calling me. On Thursday, after hosting a party at my house and letting of dozens of beautiful lit magic lanterns into the hills we all went back into Cannes where I played a ‘Hang The DJ’ set; Dexy’s Come on Eileen, The Clash’s Rock the Casbah and Joy Divison’s Love Will Tear Us Apart. I had a drink or three and enjoyed myself. On the final Friday when I hosted a relaxed BBQ at my house for my friends (and the odd gatecrasher!) the sun came out, my pool filled up and another developer showed off his ‘portfolio’ which not all of the guests were impressed by!

The last two years have been very tough for all of us developers. I started this business in the last recession with a great product, great people and new ideas. I am determined to grow Urban Splash and make the most of the great opportunities that lie before us. We’ve still got the great people and the great product and I found a few new good ideas last week.

So I now have a pocket full of cards to follow up on, lots of jokes about my rather loud checked Tom Ford suit – the biggest ‘cheques’ seen in MIPIM this year (why was I the only one told to wear fancy dress?). I still don’t know who the excellent MIPIM tweeter Twipim is but all in all enjoyed a pleasant week, and spent a very pleasant few days my house with my favourite 89 years young architect Antti Lovag who I was lucky enough to have inherited with the house!

To read more MIPIM blogs:

Crain’s

Place North West

Birmingham Post

Building Design

Property Week

Filed under: Tom Bloxham MBE, Urban Splash - tags:

Contribute to the Urban Splash blog. Email blog@urbansplash.co.uk

1 comments to My MIPIM by Tom Bloxham MBE

  1. JC Goldenstein says:

    We felt the market sentiment was more positive this year. Some were sober as you say but our proprietary analysis of the MIPIM buzz shows that words such as ‘recovery’, ‘improved’ and ‘hope’ have increased in use compared with a year ago, outnumbering negative expressions such as ‘crisis’, ‘problems’ and ‘recession’.” And the word ‘party’ has re-appeared, but the flutes were half full this year versus half empty last year and the “Gin and Panic” of two years ago.” To see more about the sentiment in Cannes you could visit http://www.creopoint.com/forum/topics/creopoint-kpmg-study-confirms

 « First  / ... « 4  / 5  / 6  / 7  / 8  /» ...  Last »  /